|
|
Post by JP on Sept 10, 2005 14:49:19 GMT 1
Is 2 minutes for fighting to little in the EIHL, or should it be 2+2 like it used to be?
Apparently there's talk of changing that rule already.
Your thoughts...
|
|
|
|
Post by jakemurrall7 on Sept 10, 2005 16:52:42 GMT 1
i think it should be kept as it was last season, there was no problem with it, i thought anyway
|
|
|
|
Post by Claret & Blue Army on Sept 11, 2005 23:51:22 GMT 1
Yes to 2 minutes as I believe it is in conjunction with the 3 fights and out rule this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by hatman dave on Sept 12, 2005 1:52:06 GMT 1
traditionally i think it should be 2 roughing and 5 for fighting, I may be wrong and its only NHL rules that do this, 2+2 is a good twist though, as theres no 10 minutes/game misconduct for the second major penalty. How does the 3 fights rule work then? (apart from the obvious...)
|
|
|
|
Post by King Rich on Sept 12, 2005 2:24:13 GMT 1
Not too keen on the blurry line between roughing and fighting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Sept 12, 2005 11:38:16 GMT 1
Bring back 2+2 for roughing. I love a good scrap, but 2 mins for fighting is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by PW on Sept 12, 2005 11:59:36 GMT 1
2+2 for fighting, then 2+10, then game...
That way, the fighting doesn't get removed from the game completely, but the EIHL won't get turned into a bush league..
No league in the world has 2 minutes for fighting-not even the so-called 'goon leagues'...
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Sept 12, 2005 16:07:05 GMT 1
2 mins is making our league ridiculous.
I mean, if some skilled euro's hear that our league is 2 mins for fighting, then they might not want to play in this league.
|
|
|
|
Post by hatman dave on Sept 12, 2005 16:09:56 GMT 1
I mean, if some skilled euro's hear that our league is 2 mins for fighting, then they might not want to play in this league. yeah.. and what would we do without those coins eh? |
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Sept 12, 2005 16:15:57 GMT 1
2 mins for a fight- I'd like to see a Viper -v- Racer game this season.
|
|
