|
Post by King Rich on Sept 20, 2004 19:54:38 GMT 1
I think the table located here is quite misleading, as it has both a column for both "wins" and "OT wins", and for every over-time win, it not only adds one to that column, but one for the "win" column as well.... Like Coventry Blaze at the moment are like: W/OTW/D/L/OTL/P 1/1/2/1/0/4 And the same thing is with the losses and overtime losses.... I knowit's only a little thing but it's bugging me. There's no need for an OTW column, and the OTL shouldn't go into the losses bit as well. Rant over.
|
|
JAC
I'm A Regular Now
AKA Bob
Posts: 252
|
Post by JAC on Sept 20, 2004 20:22:48 GMT 1
its also wrong as the blaze are actually 3rd as we have an ot win where as panthers win was in regulation. they would probably have been better counting ot and regulation wins in the win column and putting in brackets the number of those that were ot wins.
|
|
|
Post by Claret & Blue Army on Sept 20, 2004 22:59:37 GMT 1
How confusing is that BNL league that they show on Ceefax as it includes games against the two EPL sides and the results of the Elite crossover games.
Hope they've got Carol Vorderman doing the sums
|
|
Carpo
Post-Happy
Posts: 596
|
Post by Carpo on Sept 21, 2004 9:55:08 GMT 1
It does count actually King Rich, as the classifation format goes like this:
1. Points. 2. Wins (in regulation) 3. Wins (overall) 4. Games between the teams.
|
|
|
Post by King Rich on Sept 21, 2004 12:05:57 GMT 1
fair do's, but i think it's confusing to fill in the "wins" column as well as the OTW column for an OTW.
|
|
|
Post by King Rich on Sept 25, 2004 20:41:06 GMT 1
Hey they changed it, cool
|
|