|
Post by Claret & Blue Army on Sept 24, 2004 17:58:34 GMT 1
just because they have played on the same team before, doesn't mean they won't want a piece of each other when playing against each other. Too true remember Tasker and Eley (When he played briefly for Solihull) a few years back
|
|
Wacko
Wow, I Can Post
Posts: 8
|
Post by Wacko on Oct 2, 2004 13:20:34 GMT 1
Payette is a wus on the ice i've seen nowt that gives him that hard man satus. Oh and He's a wus off it to. I know.
|
|
|
Post by Monkey Harris on Oct 2, 2004 14:03:28 GMT 1
Payette is a wus on the ice i've seen nowt that gives him that hard man satus. Oh and He's a wus off it to. I know. How do you know? Very intelligent comment by the way
|
|
|
Post by King Rich on Oct 2, 2004 19:36:48 GMT 1
booboo AKA Wacko, 4 of your 6 posts on the forum so far have contained the word "wuss". Why are you so obsessed with calling people wusses?
Andre is not a wuss, he is a nutter.
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Oct 2, 2004 23:01:37 GMT 1
if he was a nutter he would have fought anglestad tonight after several offers. he is not THAT hard, as enforcers go, but hes tough.
|
|
|
Post by GazzatheDevil on Oct 2, 2004 23:07:10 GMT 1
In all fairness icewars Payette had already fought Bowen so had he fought angelstad would have been thrown out and cost his team
in this instance Payette played the game well imo
|
|
|
Post by JP on Oct 3, 2004 12:45:50 GMT 1
In all fairness icewars Payette had already fought Bowen so had he fought angelstad would have been thrown out and cost his team in this instance Payette played the game well imo Totally agree, would have been foolish to drop 'em again and get thrown out! P.S Remember what this thread is for (it's an Andre v Craighead thread) and as you said nothing about Craighead Wacko it seems that your trying to just have a dig at Andre!
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Oct 3, 2004 13:58:34 GMT 1
I was comparing payette to a statement of wacko. To me a wacko is an idiot, I was saying if he was an idiot he would have fought Anglestad, probably lost and got chucked out of the game.
|
|
|
Post by PW on Oct 3, 2004 14:00:00 GMT 1
I am willing to lay a considerable amount of money that Wacko will not take the chance to go up to Andre himself and call him a wuss, nor that he can't play hockey...and therefore should avoid saying such things on a public forum lest they get back to the person concerned...
That's all I shall say on the validity or otherwise of his views on both Andre and fighting.
|
|
oneill
Wow, I Can Post
Posts: 48
|
Post by oneill on Oct 3, 2004 18:14:35 GMT 1
I like the way Payette is and plays but i think he was smart in fighting Bowen and not Angelstad. Bowens not afraid to drop them but Angelstad is in a diffrent league and Payette knows this..Next time we play you's i think Angelstad will be gunning for Andre untill he drops them..Wacko how do you know??
|
|
bonj
Wow, I Can Post
Posts: 7
|
Post by bonj on Oct 3, 2004 21:19:12 GMT 1
after tonights game we can clearly see payette is a good fighter, won his first wih ferone without a doubt and he slipped in his second an thn ferone started layin into so in the end a draw for fight 2, well done payette
|
|
|
Post by King Rich on Oct 3, 2004 21:28:57 GMT 1
From my view from block 2 it seemed to me that it was a clear win for Ferone in the second fight. It was all over too quickly second time around, Ferone was in with a series of quick jabs.
The first fight was excellent though. I'd go and buy a copy of the game for that. If they've started putting real sound on the games now.
|
|
|
Post by Giguere35 on Oct 3, 2004 22:08:06 GMT 1
What i dont understand is why when Andre drops the gloves he sets himself as in Queensbury rules which lets the other guy in with a chance instead of getting stright in and doin the bizzo and layin the other guy out
|
|
|
Post by GazzatheDevil on Oct 3, 2004 22:48:33 GMT 1
Dave Simms thoughts on the Payette and ferone fights was first time a Draw and Second time a ferone win, ferone is a pretty tough guy but i thought Payette would have taken the win tbh
|
|
|
Post by King Rich on Oct 3, 2004 23:21:58 GMT 1
Was Dave Simms there? But yeah that's right.
|
|